Flunarizine: History, Development, and Global Use in Migraine and Vertigo

If you’ve ever wondered how a drug can be a go-to in one part of the world and nearly invisible in another, this story is your case study. The arc of flunarizine-from lab curiosity to migraine mainstay to safety-labeled niche option-shows how science, regulation, and real-world use shape a medication’s life. Expect a concise timeline, what it actually does, what the studies found, where it’s approved, and why some doctors swear by it while others never learn it in training.

• TL;DR: Discovered by Janssen in the early 1970s, flunarizine is a centrally acting calcium-channel blocker used for migraine prevention and vestibular disorders outside the U.S.
• Evidence: Older RCTs and modern reviews show fewer migraine days and higher 50% responder rates versus placebo, with efficacy similar to propranolol and topiramate in many comparisons.
• Safety: Sedation, weight gain, depression, and parkinsonism drove label restrictions; avoid in people with current or past depression or Parkinson’s disease.
• Regulatory status: Approved in parts of Europe, Asia, and Latin America; not FDA-approved in the U.S.; availability varies by country.
• Today’s use: A practical option when beta-blockers, topiramate, or amitriptyline don’t fit-especially in vestibular migraine-if mood/EPS risks are low and you use night dosing and periodic reassessment.

From lab bench to pharmacy shelf: a timeline that actually matters

The late 1960s and early 1970s were fertile years for Janssen Pharmaceutica. Building on cinnarizine, chemists explored diphenylpiperazines that could calm the vestibular system and blunt neuronal excitability. Flunarizine emerged from this series. Early patents and internal reports (Janssen Pharmaceutica filings, early 1970s) described a centrally acting calcium-channel blocker with antihistamine-like features and long tissue persistence.

By the late 1970s, first approvals landed in parts of Europe for vertigo and migraine prevention under the brand Sibelium. Through the 1980s, more countries in Europe, Latin America, and Asia joined. Clinicians liked the once-daily evening dose and the way patients described it: fewer dizzy spells, fewer throbbing mornings. Small trials even tested it as add-on therapy in refractory epilepsy (1980s), but that thread didn’t hold-benefit was inconsistent, and it never became a standard anti-seizure drug.

The 1990s brought caution. Pharmacovigilance systems flagged clusters of depressive episodes and extrapyramidal symptoms (parkinsonism), especially in older adults and in long, uninterrupted use. Labels tightened: contraindications for depression and Parkinson’s disease, dose caps, advice to reassess need after several months. In some countries, marketing authorizations lapsed or were not renewed; availability narrowed. The U.S. never approved it, largely because no sponsor brought a successful application forward and because alternatives already covered the space.

In the 2000s and 2010s, European and national regulators re-reviewed the class (including cinnarizine). EMA’s Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee endorsed continued use with stricter precautions and clearer wording on mood and movement risks (PRAC class assessments, 2012-2019; SmPC updates for Sibelium). Meanwhile, headache and otoneurology clinics in Italy, Spain, India, and China kept using it-often for vestibular migraine-because patients responded.

By 2025, flunarizine sits in a pragmatic spot: a generic, low-cost option in many non‑U.S. markets for migraine prevention and vestibular disorders, with prescribers trained to screen for mood and motor risks, start low at night, and periodically pause to see if it’s still needed.

Source signals: Janssen Pharmaceutica development history (1970s); national SmPCs where marketed; EMA PRAC assessments (2012-2019); WHO ATC classification N07CA03 (latest list).

What it does: the pharmacology in plain language

Mechanistically, flunarizine is a non‑selective calcium-channel blocker that acts in the brain. Unlike heart-focused calcium blockers like verapamil or amlodipine, this one is built to slip into the central nervous system. It dampens T‑type and L‑type calcium currents in neurons, stabilizes firing, and lowers the chance that microcircuits will tip into the hyperexcitable state that underpins migraine. It also nudges sodium channels and has mild antihistamine activity. That cocktail explains both the benefit (fewer attacks, less dizziness) and the common side effects (sleepiness, weight gain).

It’s lipophilic and hangs around. After you swallow a capsule, it peaks in a few hours, then settles into tissues with a long terminal half‑life on the order of weeks (often cited around 18 days in pharmacokinetic summaries). The upside is once‑daily dosing and a smooth effect. The downside is slow washout: if side effects hit, they can take time to fade.

Metabolism runs through the liver. Multiple CYP enzymes contribute, with 2D6 and 3A pathways discussed in pharmacology texts and SmPCs. That means strong inhibitors (for example, paroxetine/fluoxetine on 2D6; some azoles or macrolides on 3A) can raise levels. Additive sedation with alcohol, benzodiazepines, or sedating antihistamines is common sense to avoid. There’s no meaningful blood pressure drop at standard migraine doses, which is one reason it appealed as an alternative to beta‑blockers in people with asthma or low resting BP.

Dosing has stayed simple for decades:

• Adults: 5 mg at night for older adults or those sensitive to sedation; 10 mg at night in younger, non‑sedation‑prone patients.
• Pediatrics (where permitted locally): lower weight‑based starts (often 5 mg nightly in adolescents), with careful monitoring.
• Trial window: give it 6-8 weeks. If there’s no clear response, reconsider; if it works, many clinicians pulse it (for example, 6-9 months on, then a pause) to check if the condition quieted down.

How is it different from better‑known calcium blockers? Verapamil has more cardiac effects and is used off‑label in cluster headache. Dihydropyridines (like amlodipine) don’t do much for migraine. Cinnarizine is a cousin with more antihistamine feel. Lomerizine, popular in Japan, was designed to keep the central benefits while dialing back side effects.

Evidence, indications, and why its regulatory footprint looks odd

The migraine data started in the late 1970s and 1980s with randomized trials that, by today’s standards, were small but decent. Patients on flunarizine had fewer monthly attacks and used fewer rescue meds than those on placebo. Head-to-heads versus propranolol and pizotifen suggested similar efficacy in many studies. A Cochrane review (Linde et al., 2015) pooled the old trials and found higher 50% responder rates vs placebo and a reduction in attack frequency of roughly 1-2 days per month-right in the range we still consider clinically meaningful for oral preventives.

Vestibular migraine is where it quietly shines. Otoneurology clinics have published cohorts and pragmatic trials showing reductions in vertigo frequency and severity. The mechanism fits: central calcium-channel modulation calms vestibular nuclei. National guidance in countries where it’s available often lists it among first‑line or early options for vestibular migraine (e.g., Italian and Chinese otoneurology recommendations over the last decade).

Pediatric migraine use shows up in regional guidelines and hospital pathways outside the U.S., often for adolescents who can’t tolerate beta‑blockers or topiramate. The evidence base is smaller than in adults, so clinicians lean on careful titration and short trial periods.

Why isn’t it available everywhere? Two reasons. First, no successful U.S. new drug application ever made it through, and once other preventives filled the market-propranolol, amitriptyline, topiramate, and now CGRP therapies-there wasn’t a clear commercial push. Second, the safety profile made regulators ask for stricter labeling. EMA’s PRAC concluded benefits outweigh risks if you screen for depression and Parkinson’s disease, cap doses, and reassess need, so many EU countries kept it. Others let authorizations lapse or chose not to market it. The WHO’s ATC classification lists it under N07CA03 (drugs for vertigo), which captures its roots on the balance side as much as the headache side.

What do guidelines say in 2025? Where it’s marketed, national headache societies often include it as a first‑ or second‑line oral preventive, especially when beta‑blockers, topiramate, or amitriptyline aren’t ideal. American guidelines don’t discuss it because it isn’t available. CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants changed the landscape, but cost and access keep the older, oral options very relevant-and that’s the niche flunarizine still fills.

Practical rules of thumb (clinician-facing but patient-friendly):

• Think of it in vestibular migraine or classic migraine when you need night‑time dosing and want to avoid blood pressure effects.
• Avoid if the person has current/past depression, Parkinson’s disease, or unexplained extrapyramidal symptoms.
• Start low (5 mg) if there’s any concern about sedation, weight, or age over 60; reassess in 6-8 weeks.
• Build in pauses (for example, every 6-9 months) to check if the condition has cooled off and to reduce cumulative risk.

Safety lessons, comparisons, and where it fits right now

Side effects track with its central actions. The common ones: sleepiness (especially in the first weeks), increased appetite and weight gain, and dry mouth. The important but less common ones: depressed mood, anergia, and parkinsonism (rigidity, tremor, slowness). Hyperprolactinemia can show up as breast symptoms or menstrual changes. These risks are why labels worldwide warn against use in people with a history of depression or Parkinson’s disease.

Risk management is behavioral as much as pharmacological:

• Night dosing only; remind people not to take it in the morning just because they forgot-skip it.
• Plan a check‑in at 2-3 weeks (sleepiness, appetite), and another at 6-8 weeks (efficacy, mood, motor symptoms).
• If new low mood, loss of interest, or motor stiffness/tremor appears, stop and don’t push through it. The long half‑life means improvements can take days to weeks; be patient and avoid stacking sedatives.
• In older adults, prefer 5 mg and shorter courses with planned drug holidays.

How does it compare to common alternatives?

• Propranolol: similar efficacy for migraine prevention; better for people with anxiety/tachycardia; not ideal in asthma or low BP. Flunarizine avoids BP issues but can cause sedation and weight gain.
• Topiramate: often stronger in head‑to‑head modern practice, but cognitive side effects and paresthesias limit it; flunarizine can be gentler cognitively but riskier for mood in susceptible people.
• Amitriptyline: great for sleep and pain comorbidity; anticholinergic baggage. Flunarizine is less anticholinergic but still sedating.
• Cinnarizine: close cousin; slightly more antihistamine‑like; availability depends on country; similar mood/EPS cautions.
• CGRP monoclonals/gepants: strong efficacy and clean CNS profiles; expensive and access‑limited in many regions. Flunarizine remains a low‑cost oral option where available.

Quick checklist (patient and clinician can use this together):

• Before starting: any history of depression, Parkinson’s disease, or unexplained tremor? If yes, pick something else.
• Start: 5 mg at night (older adults) or 10 mg at night (younger, low sedation risk).
• First month: stick to night dosing, avoid alcohol and new sedatives, track sleepiness and appetite.
• Week 6-8: is the 50% responder bar met (half as many bad days)? If not, reconsider.
• Every 6-9 months: pause and reassess need; watch for mood or motor changes during and after use.

Mini‑FAQ

• Why is it not FDA‑approved? No successful U.S. application plus adequate alternatives; safety labeling needs also made the business case weak.
• How long until it works? Many see changes by week 3-4; check at week 6-8 to judge.
• Can it cause depression? Yes. Labels list depression as a contraindication. Screen before starting and monitor during the first 2-3 months.
• Is it safe during pregnancy or breastfeeding? Data are limited; most labels advise against use. Discuss alternatives with a specialist if pregnancy is planned or possible.
• What if I gain weight or feel too sleepy? Night dosing, earlier bedtimes, and lighter evening meals help. If it persists, reduce the dose or stop and switch.

Next steps and troubleshooting

• If you’re a patient in a country where it’s available: ask your clinician whether your migraine pattern (especially vestibular migraine) and your mood history make you a good candidate.
• If you’re a clinician: screen mood and motor history first; pick a night dose; schedule a 2-3 week touchpoint; plan a 6-8 week decision.
• If access is limited: consider related options (cinnarizine where available) or conventional preventives (propranolol, topiramate, amitriptyline) and, when feasible, CGRP‑pathway therapies.
• If side effects appear after stopping: remember the long half‑life-improvement may be gradual; avoid adding sedatives; document and report if severe.

Credibility anchors for the above: Janssen Pharmaceutica development records (1970s); national and EMA SmPCs for Sibelium with mood/EPS contraindications (latest widely cited versions around 2019); EMA PRAC assessments on cinnarizine/flunarizine class risks (2012 onward); Cochrane Review on flunarizine for migraine prevention (Linde etal., 2015); WHO ATC code N07CA03 (current list); national headache and otoneurology guidelines from countries where it is marketed (Italy, China, India, 2018-2024 editions). These primary sources underpin the timeline, effect sizes, and safety guidance presented here.

Soren Fife

I'm a pharmaceutical scientist dedicated to researching and developing new treatments for illnesses and diseases. I'm passionate about finding ways to improve existing medications, as well as discovering new ones. I'm also interested in exploring how pharmaceuticals can be used to treat mental health issues.